.NET News Desk
Bill Gates & Microsoft Herald "A New Generation of Software and Web Services"
'Microsoft has been working with the industry to advance a new generation of software that is interoperable by design, reducing the need for custom development and cumbersome testing and certification,' wrote Bill Gates yesterday in an 'executive e-mail' sent to all subscribers to executive e-mails from Microsoft, outlining the company's work 'to make its products interoperate well in a diverse IT environment.'
Reader Feedback : Page 1 of 1
#18 |
StevieWonder commented on the 4 Feb 2005
Way to go Contradiction! Read my post on Maureen O'Garas "Microsoft, the Interoperator, As I Live and Breathe!". |
#17 |
Contradiction commented on the 4 Feb 2005
Everyone complains MS doesn't do interop. Then MS *does* pledge to do interop. Everyone STILL complains. Funny old world. |
#16 |
buklmarket05 commented on the 4 Feb 2005
## quezztion commented on 4 February 2005: How about Bill Gates just buys out Sun? ## I'd let my shares go for $10.00 although I'm sure others would want more but $10 seems fair to me and Microsoft can afford anything they want. |
#15 |
quezztion commented on the 4 Feb 2005
How about Bill Gates just buys out Sun? |
#14 |
klasdas commented on the 4 Feb 2005
Take a look at this paper: [visit link] |
#13 |
hakuin_us commented on the 4 Feb 2005
Since linux runs on practically everything and is reliable and secure, a linux monoculture would be a vast improvement. |
#12 |
Billy commented on the 4 Feb 2005
Always fun to receive an e-mail from God. All power to Gates, if he can be bothered to write to everyone, that's no bad thing. Communication is always good. |
#11 |
Daniel Wallace commented on the 4 Feb 2005
>The fact that this is so transparent leaves me wondering >why we are still using the word "monoculture" when we all >know that "monoculture" is simply code language for >"MS-Culture." I believe you misspelled "monoculture" it' m-o-n-o-p-o-l-y. |
#10 |
fatcitystate commented on the 4 Feb 2005
I have a very simple question for those who either propagate or agree with the concept that monoculture is dangerous. If an organization was running all Linux on their desktops and servers, would you tell them that they have a big monoculture problem and they should immediately convert half of their desktops and servers to Windows XP and Windows 2003 in the name of cyber diversity? I would put money on the table that 9 out of 10 monoculture opponents would not. Its no secret that the Washington-based anti-Microsoft lobby group CCIA is really more concerned about a Microsoft culture than a monoculture. The fact that this is so transparent leaves me wondering why we are still using the word "monoculture" when we all know that "monoculture" is simply code language for "MS-Culture." Why not call it what it is and say "we're concerned about the MS-Culture" instead of "we're concerned about Monoculture?" |
#9 |
Uh oh commented on the 4 Feb 2005
Look like the monoculture world is on its way. |
#8 |
delenda_est_microsoft commented on the 4 Feb 2005
Big Brother Gates speaks |
#7 |
intentoserjusto commented on the 4 Feb 2005
kindler, gentler, more interoperable? or another buzz word spree? you make the call... |
#6 |
peecee user commented on the 4 Feb 2005
Bill Gates is the bozo that said the Internet would never amount to anything then rewrote his road ahead book to add the Internet when he realized he was dead wrong. Listening to Gates for future directions is a sure way to be wrong. Don't confuse vision with market position. The former takes skill. The later is something to be lost to people with the former. Why is google almost a verb in the english language? Because Bill Gates missed the boat yet again. |
#5 |
symbolic commented on the 4 Feb 2005
I can easily see Microsoft lapsing into the same kind of "saturated market mentality" that afflicts other industries. Instead of focusing on innovation and providing real value, they'll focus on ways to use the same medium to extract more cash- increased licensing fees, unbundling of certain components, software-as-a-service, annual subscriptions, and countless other possibilities that will require payment over and above the base cost. |
#4 |
jc42 commented on the 4 Feb 2005
Remember the discussions a while back about MS patenting some of their XML encoding schemes? |