|
|
YOUR FEEDBACK
SOA World Conference
Virtualization Conference $50 Savings Expire June 24, 2008... – Register Today! Did you read today's front page stories & breaking news?
SYS-CON.TV SYS-CON.TV WEBCASTS |
TODAY'S TOP SOA & WEBSERVICES LINKS Feature
What Is XLIFF and Why Should I Use It?
A brief overview of the XML Localization Interchange File Format (XLIFF)
Sep. 19, 2005 03:00 PM
Digg This!
Page 4 of 4
« previous page
Within the database for the CMS, the content was stored as segments of HTML. The Web pages were generated by assigning the HTML segments to placeholders on the page. Listing 5 shows an example of an HTML segment stored within the CMS. We made use of in-line tags to preserve the formatting information from the HTML segment and to ensure that the file created was a valid, well-formed XLIFF file (see Listing 6). The XLIFF files that were transported to and from the CMS were translated using a software translation tool. These tools use Translation Memory technology in order to reuse previous translations. The editor is designed so a translator can only edit those parts of the XLIFF that relate to translations. What was striking during this project was how stable XLIFF was as a localization format. At that time, we needed to localize problematic HTML files. Using XLIFF assured the technical quality of the end delivery.
A Brief History of XLIFF Our schedule was aggressive, and the 1.0 draft specification was completed within six months. Once the core deliverables were completed, the group began preparing the specification for public distribution throughout the industry for comment. We recognized that we lacked the organizational and intellectual property framework and procedural expertise that was needed to support the advancement of our work. So in the autumn of 2001, the XLIFF group commenced an investigation of consortia as potential homes for our work. Specifically, we researched OASIS, W3C, and LISA, and selected OASIS because of its XML focus, and because it provided us with a turnkey infrastructure within which to operate. A secondary but important factor was that many of our member companies were already members of OASIS. Over the life of the TC, corporate participation has included: Bowne Global Solutions, Convey Software, HP, IBM, Lionbridge, LRC, Microsoft, Moravia IT, Novell, Oracle, RWS Group/Enlaso, SAP, SDL International, Sun Microsystems, TRADOS, and Xerox. The educational institution Localisation Research Centre of the University of Limerick is also a member of the TC. Individual members have included Doug Domeny, Paul Gampe, Enda McDonnell, Florian Sachse, Bryan Schnabel, Shigemichi Yazawa, and Andrzej Zydron. The XLIFF 1.0 Specification was submitted to the Technical Committee as the starting point for its work, and was reviewed and approved by the TC on April 15, 2002 as an OASIS Committee Specification. The TC decided not to submit the 1.0 specification as an official OASIS standard, choosing instead to focus on completing revision 1.1 to deliver key improvements, including customization and extensibility using private namespaces, embedded XLIFF, and improved data validation via XSD rather than 1.0's DTD. The XLIFF 1.1 Specification was approved as an OASIS committee specification on October 31, 2003. The TC is currently authoring a number of profile specifications to help tools developers and implementers implement XLIFF 1.1 consistently. The HTML Profile has been completed and will be made available publicly, and the final draft of the PO/POT Files Profile shall be made public shortly. Profiles are being authored for Java Resource Bundles and other proprietary resources formats, and public drafts will be published within the next quarter. The TC is also finalizing guidelines for XLIFF's support of segmentation - the process of optimizing the reuse of previously translated discrete logical or linguistic units of translatable content. After the profiles and segmentation guidelines are published and publicly reviewed, the TC plans to submit the XLIFF 1.1 spec and related profiles to the OASIS standards review process for consideration as an official OASIS standard.
Conclusion References
Page 4 of 4 « previous page XML JOURNAL LATEST STORIES . . .
SUBSCRIBE TO THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NEWSLETTERS SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS FEEDS & GET YOUR SYS-CON NEWS LIVE!
|
SYS-CON FEATURED WHITEPAPERS MOST READ THIS WEEK BREAKING XML NEWS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||