| By Reuven Cohen | Article Rating: |
|
| September 15, 2008 07:40 AM EDT | Reads: |
4,363 |
Reuven Cohen's Blog
Lately it seems there are a number of people in the cloud computing community who are starting to discuss alternatives to the dreaded five nines concept and looking at ways that cloud-based infrastructures could be configured/deployed in a manner that is more proactive than reactive to disasters.
For about as long as there have been computer networks, administrators have attempted to keep these networks up and running. It seems to be a continuous battle between faulty hardware, poorly written software, unreliable connectivity and random acts of God. With the emergence of cloud computing we are now for the first time close to realizing a computing environment where we are able to focus less on keeping our applications up and more on making them run more efficiently and effectively.
In the case of a physical failure such as FlexiScale's recent one, the hardware downtime might be small, but the time to restore from a backup might be considerably longer. A minor cloud failure could cause a cascading series of software failures causing further application outage of hours or even days for those who depended on the availability of the given cloud. Meaning your cloud may achive five nines, but your application hosted on it doesn't.
Lately it seems there are a number of people in the cloud computing community who are starting to discuss alternatives to the dreaded five nines concept and looking at ways that cloud based infrastructures could be configured/deployed in a manner that is more proactive than reactive to disasters. There is a growing consensus that cloud-based disaster recovery may very well be the "killer app" for cloud computing. To achieve this, we need to start creating reference architectures and models that assume for failure. One that doesn't need to worry when the next disaster will happen next, just that it will happen and when it does, it's going to be business as usual.
In a recent conversation with Alan Gin founder of a super secret stealth firm called Zeronines, Alan described an interesting philosophy. He said the problem with most disaster recovery plans is the recovery is reactive, it is what happens after a disaster has already harmed your business. He said on its face, this is an unsound strategy. He went on to say; That current disaster recovery architectures, which uses the synonym “failover,” is based on the cutover archetype: a system’s primary component fails, damaging operations; then failover to a secondary component is attempted to resume operations. The problem with current cutover approaches is that it views unplanned downtime as inevitable, acceptable, and so requires that business halt.
I really liked this quote from an executive from EMC, a leading computer storage equipment firm, “current failover infrastructures are failures waiting to happen.”
To be competitive in today's always connected, always available world. We need to reinvent the fundamental idea of disaster recovery. One of the major benefits to using cloud computing is that you can make these types of failover assumptions well before they happen using an emerging global toolset of cloud components. It's not a matter of if, but a matter of when, when you take into consideration that application components will fail then you can build an application that features "failure as service". One that is always available, one with Zero Nines.
Published September 15, 2008 Reads 4,363
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Reuven Cohen
Reuven Cohen is Founder & CTO for Toronto based Enomaly Inc. - leading developer of Cloud Computing products and solutions focused on enterprise businesses. Enomaly's products include the Enomaly elastic computing platform, an open source cloud platform that enables a scalable enterprise IT and local cloud infrastructure platform. Cohen is a thought leader in the emerging cloud computing industry and maintains a blog at www.elasticvapor.com.
Reuven is also founder of several technology organizations;
Enomaly.com - Elastic Computing Platform (Cloud Computing),
Cloud Camp - Local Cloud Computing events,
the Unified Cloud Interface Project - Semantic Cloud Abstraction API
Cloud Interoperability Forum - Cloud Standards Group.
(twitter @ruv : Linkedin : RSS Feed)
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- Will PR Firms Survive The New Media Avalanche?
- Publishing Synergy: Blog, Twitter and Ulitzer
- Typhoon Ondoy (Ketsana) Hits the Philippines (Part 2)
- Combining the Cloud with the Computing: Application Delivery Networks
- SOA World Magazine’s 8th Annual "Readers' Choice Awards" Nominations Open
- Confessions of a Ulitzer Addict
- My Thoughts on Ulitzer
- Ulitzer vs. Ning
- Orchestration in the Cloud to Manage Lower Operational Costs
- AJAX World RIA Conference & Expo Kicks Off in New York City
- Sun Federal's Dr Harry Foxwell to Speak at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- Ted Weissman and Lois Paul & Partners PR Firm
- Will PR Firms Survive The New Media Avalanche?
- Publishing Synergy: Blog, Twitter and Ulitzer
- Improving the Efficiency of SOA-Based Applications
- Typhoon Ondoy (Ketsana) Hits the Philippines (Part 2)
- SOA, BPM, CEP: Getting IT Budget in a Tight Economy
- Combining the Cloud with the Computing: Application Delivery Networks
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- AJAX World RIA Conference & Expo Kicks Off in New York City
- JSON vs XML - A Jason vs Freddie Sequel
- Processing XML with C# and .NET
- Has the Technology Bounceback Begun?
- BPEL Processes and Human Workflow
- Open Source Database Special Feature: An Introduction to Berkeley DB XML
- "HP's Problem Ain't the SAP Install," Says Sun's Schwartz
- eXist - An Introduction To Open Source Native XML Database
- Digitizing the Planet: Google Earth vs MSN Virtual Earth vs MapQuest



































