| By PR Newswire | Article Rating: |
|
| December 13, 2005 11:19 PM EST |
COLCHESTER, Conn., Dec. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- Scott+Scott, LLC (http://www.scott-scott.com/), at the direction of clients, has filed a securities fraud class action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio against Diebold Inc. ("Diebold" or the "Company") and individual defendants. Presently, the class is defined in the complaint drafted by Scott+Scott as those who purchased Diebold securities between October 22, 2003, and September 21, 2005, inclusive (the "Class Period"). However, any purchaser of Diebold securities can contact the firm as the Class Period may change as information is revealed. Diebold engages in the development, manufacture, sale, and service of systems, software, and various products used to equip bank facilities such as automatic teller machines.
If you purchased Diebold securities during the Class Period and wish to serve as a lead plaintiff in the action, you must move the court no later than 60 days from today. Any member of the purported class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. If you wish to discuss this action or have questions concerning this notice or your rights, please contact Scott+Scott for more information. Scott+Scott will provide class members with case materials, answer all questions regarding participation and rights and assist with other services the firm provides. There is no cost or fee to you. Contact Scott+Scott partner Neil Rothstein (nrothstein@scott-scott.com, 800/332-2259, ext. 22 or cell 619/251-0887). Diebold investors may also contact the firm at DieboldSecuritiesLitigation@scott-scott.com.
The complaint alleges that defendants violated provisions of the United States securities laws causing artificial inflation of the Company's stock price. According to the complaint, during the Class Period, the Company lacked a credible state of internal controls and corporate compliance and remained unable to assure the quality and working order of its voting machine products. It is further alleged that the Company's false and misleading statements served to conceal the dimensions and scope of internal problems at the Company, impacting product quality, strategic planning, forecasting and guidance and culminating in false representations of astonishingly low and incredibly inaccurate restructuring charges for the 2005 fiscal year, which grossly understated the true costs and problems defendants faced to restructure the Company. The complaint also alleges over $2.7 million of insider trading proceeds obtained by individual defendants during the Class Period.
Finally, investors learned the truth about the adverse impact of the Company's alleged defective and deficient inventory-related controls and systems on Diebold's financial performance. As a result of defendants' shocking news and disclosures of September 21, 2005, the price of Diebold shares plunged 15.5% on unusually high volume, falling from $44.37 per share on September 20, 2005, to $37.47 per share on September 21, 2005, for a one- day drop of $6.90 per share on volume of 6.1 million shares -- nearly eight times the average daily trading volume.
The plaintiff is represented by Scott+Scott, LLC, which has significant experience in prosecuting investor class actions. The firm dedicates itself to client communication and satisfaction and currently is litigating major securities, antitrust and employee retirement plan actions throughout the United States. The firm represents pension funds, charities, foundations, individuals and other entities worldwide. Cases currently being litigated and/or investigated by Scott+Scott, LLC include: Refco, Inc.; Guidant Corp.; Abbott Laboratories; Halliburton; TRM Corp.; and Faro Tech., among others. Its success has brought shareholders hundreds of millions of dollars in cases against Mattel, Royal Dutch/Shell, Sprint, ImClone and others.
Scott+Scott, LLCCONTACT: Neil Rothstein of Scott+Scott, LLC, +1-800-332-2259 ext. 22,
+1-619-251-0887 (mobile), nrothstein@scott-scott.com
Published December 13, 2005
Copyright © 2005 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
About PR Newswire
Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
- AJAX World RIA Conference & Expo Kicks Off in New York City
- Ulitzer’s Amazing First 30 Days in Public Beta
- "Government IT Expo" to Highlight Cloud Computing and SOA
- Ulitzer vs. Ning - a Quick Review
- Improving the Efficiency of SOA-Based Applications
- Make Your Design Ideas Speak: Using UML in PowerBuilder Projects
- Ted Weissman and Lois Paul & Partners PR Firm
- SOA to Reduce Complexity?
- VMware Poaches CA Exec to Run Asia Pacific
- Cisco to Buy Tidal Software
- AJAX World RIA Conference & Expo Kicks Off in New York City
- Building the Right Project Team: The Rule of Five
- Ulitzer’s Amazing First 30 Days in Public Beta
- "Government IT Expo" to Highlight Cloud Computing and SOA
- DataDirect Data Integration Suite Features XQuery 4.0, XML Converters and Stylus Studio 2009
- Reducing Development Costs with SOA
- Macrovision White Paper Showcases Digital Entertainment Media
- Software AG Releases Tamino XML Server for SOA Interface
- Dajeil Launches Xerces/Xalan Hardware Accelerator for XML and SOA
- Ulitzer vs. Ning - a Quick Review
- AJAX World RIA Conference & Expo Kicks Off in New York City
- JSON vs XML - A Jason vs Freddie Sequel
- Processing XML with C# and .NET
- i-Technology Viewpoint: The Very Confused World of 3D and XML
- BPEL Processes and Human Workflow
- Open Source Database Special Feature: An Introduction to Berkeley DB XML
- "HP's Problem Ain't the SAP Install," Says Sun's Schwartz
- eXist - An Introduction To Open Source Native XML Database
- Digitizing the Planet: Google Earth vs MSN Virtual Earth vs MapQuest
- Product Review: Altova Enterprise Suite 2005







































